Heartland Express v. Gardner
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CADY, Justice.
In this appeal, we must decide whether the workers’ compensation commissioner had subject matter jurisdiction over an employee’s claim for benefits. If the commissioner had jurisdiction over the claim, we must further consider whether a new hearing date should have been granted and whether the commissioner’s determination as to the employee’s industrial disability was supported' by substantial evidence. Ultimately, we do not reach these latter issues because we find the first issue— relating to subject matter jurisdiction— dispositive.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
James…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Andover Volunteer Fire Department v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Annett Holdings, Inc. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2007
- Amended September 2, 2016 in the Matter of James H. Martinek, a Magistrate. On Application of the IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Andover Volunteer Fire Department And Travelers Insurance Company Vs. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Andover Volunteer Fire Department v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.