Legal Opinion

Singleton v. Hope Engineering Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 1931No. 7 Div. 53PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The appeal is from a judgment sustaining demurrers to the complaint, declaring for damages resulting from an injury in Georgia.

The respective theories of the parties are that the employer of appellant was, at the time, place, and manner of the injury, operating under the Georgia Workmen’s Compensation Act (Laws 1920, p. 167 as amended), and that appellant received such compensation as the Georgia law provided; that this suit was for damages not covered by said law and based on the alleged negligent failure to promptly provide appellant with medical attention ; and that the action is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Georgia Casualty Co. v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Weir v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. O'Quinn v. AlstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Clarke County Motors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte Tri-State Motor Transit Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. Thomas J. Crider v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. Crider v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Crider v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API