Legal Opinion

Jonathan L. Kaplan v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 9, 2013No. 11-456TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEELER, Judge.

Before the Court is the Government’s Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff, Jonathan L. Kaplan, filed this action to obtain a refund of three $100 payments he made toward $86,902.76 in trust fund recovery penalties assessed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) under 26 U.S.C. § 6672. The IRS assessed the penalties after finding Mr. Kaplan liable, as a managing member, for the failure of Merchants Restaurant-SA, LLC (“Merchants Restaurant”) to remit employee withholding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jonathan L. Kaplan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Ferguson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API