Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 6, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00224PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tax refund suit; RCFC 12(b)(1); Jurisdiction — tax jurisdiction is under 28 U.S.C. § 1492(a)(1) not 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1); Statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 6532(a)(1); Equitable tolling— RFI Holdings ; Motion to dismiss granted.

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge:

In this tax refund suit, plaintiffs, Lowell G. Ferguson and Xiomara Ferguson, seek to recover Social Security and Medicare taxes. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 3101-3128 (2012). Defendant seeks to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction under RCFC 12(b)(1). For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion.

In 2005, Delta Airlines filed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Rhi Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Hinck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Topsnik v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. General Mills, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Bruyea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
  5. General Mills, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API