Legal Opinion
In Re Application of Plantamura
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 28, 1961PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
The applicant was admitted to the bar of the District of Columbia on April 24,1953. Thereafter, he practiced patent law in Washington for more than five years. On October 19, 1960, he applied for admission to the bar of Connecticut without examination under § 8, page 27, of the Practice Book, as amended in a matter immaterial to the present controversy (Cum. Sup. 1960). From a denial of his application he has appealed.
Proceedings for admission to the bar “are in the nature of investigations by the courts or their representatives to determine whether the candidate is qualified to become an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Heiberger v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Brown v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
3Cited by12 opinions
- Farricielli v. Connecticut Personnel Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- City Council v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- In Re Application of WarrenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- In Re Application of Mark W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.