Legal Opinion

Warner v. Carter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1921No. 23,115PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Jewell district court; CHARLES L. KAGEY, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one of replevin for an automobile. The defendant, Wilma M. Carter, recovered, and Warner appeals.

*286In the petition Warner claimed a special interest in the automobile, by virtue of a chattel mortgage dated January 16, 1919, and recorded on January 17. The mortgage was given by J. S. Johnson, to the Motor Bank of Denver, Colo., to secure a note for $550 due March 15. On June 18 Warner bought the note for the balance due, $310, and took an assignment of the mortgage.

The car was a new one, for which Johnson gave another car as part…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. DeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. Kerwood v. AyresSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. Edwards v. BrickerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. CrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. Gerard v. CostinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API