Warner v. Carter
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Jewell district court; CHARLES L. KAGEY, judge pro tem.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The action was one of replevin for an automobile. The defendant, Wilma M. Carter, recovered, and Warner appeals.
*286In the petition Warner claimed a special interest in the automobile, by virtue of a chattel mortgage dated January 16, 1919, and recorded on January 17. The mortgage was given by J. S. Johnson, to the Motor Bank of Denver, Colo., to secure a note for $550 due March 15. On June 18 Warner bought the note for the balance due, $310, and took an assignment of the mortgage.
The car was a new one, for which Johnson gave another car as part…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Holmberg v. DeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Kerwood v. AyresSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Edwards v. BrickerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rodgers v. CrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Gerard v. CostinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923