Legal Opinion

Fieger v. Imperial Skating Rink

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The defendant, a corporation, was operating a roller skating rink. On the 12th day of June, 1932, plaintiff, a boy 16 years old, while skating as a patron in defendant’s rink, sustained injuries by reason of the elbow of his left arm coming in contact with and being thrust through a window pane.

We quote from plaintiff’s testimony:

“Q. Was this in the evening or the afternoon!
“A. It was about eight o’clock in the evening.
“Q. What did you pay to get in?
“A. Thirty-five cents.
“Q. At the time of the injury, what were you doing?
“A. I was skating.

‘ ‘ Q. Describe to the jury how you skated.

“A. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Peters v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Sowles v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1893
  5. Stamos v. Portland Electric Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Amphitheatre Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Frame v. Arrow Towing ServiceOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Filler v. StenvickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Bryant v. Ludendi Roller Drome, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Henthorne v. HopwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API