Legal Opinion

Dethmers Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg. Co.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided January 14, 2004No. C 96-4061-MWBPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF RE. 35,482

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

[[Image here]]

In a previous ruling in this patent infringement case, this court observed that the adage “the devil is in the details” is perhaps particularly applicable to patent law. See Dethmers Mfg. Co. v. Automatic Equip. Mfg. Co., 23 F.Supp.2d 974, 981 (N.D.Iowa 1998) (Dethmers I). Indeed, it was on the basis of the “detail” that the addition of certain limitations to claims in an original patent application had not…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Engineered Products Co. v. Donaldson Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
  2. Spencer v. Annett Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2012
  3. Voice Capture, Inc. v. Intel Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004
  4. Does v. Little Rock School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2024
  5. Greene County Tech School District v. DoeDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API