Church v. Richfer Corp.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
SEILER, Judge.
This case arises from respondent’s failure to return bailed goods. Appellants, plaintiffs below, sued for breach of the bailment contract and obtained a jury verdict of $12,-760. 1 The trial court, however, granted a new trial on the basis of a defective jury instruction. On appeal, the trial court’s order granting a new trial was affirmed. On rehearing, the court of appeals en banc affirmed. We transferred the case to this court to clarify what constitutes the basic elements of a bailor’s cause of action for breach of contract when a bailee fails to return bailed property…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dilworth v. McKelvySupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- Broadview Leasing Co. v. Cape Central Airways, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kegan v. Park BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Nuell v. Forty-North CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Crow Contracting Corp. v. George F. Smith Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. EmdeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Thummel v. KrewsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- First Tennessee Bank, National Ass'n v. Graphic Arts Centre, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- West County Internal Medicine, Inc. v. Domian Standard Service, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- California & Hawaiian Sugar Co. v. Kansas City Terminal Warehouse Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.