Crow Contracting Corp. v. George F. Smith Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LACKLAND H. BLOOM, Special Judge.
Plaintiffs seek to recover damages to a Buckeye trenching machine owned by them and which they sought to sell through defendant The George F. Smith Company, Inc. Plaintiffs’ amended petition is in five counts. Count I seeks damages solely against The George F. Smith Company, Inc., founded on the breach of a contract of bailment. This defendant will herein be referred to as defendant Smith. Count II seeks to recover from defendant Smith and sets forth in effect that defendant Smith leased the trenching machine to the City of Florissant with the consent of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bride v. City of SlaterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Fulton v. City of LockwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Needles v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. McKissicSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Nuell v. Forty-North CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Beelman River Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Broadview Leasing Co. v. Cape Central Airways, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Glass v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Andrews v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Tile-Craft Products Co. v. Colonial Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.