Legal Opinion

Del Papa v. Steffen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1996No. 27847PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent Justices have appointed a “Special Master” to investigate alleged leaks of information to the press in violation of two early orders by a panel of this court directing that the proceedings before this court in Case No. 24598, “the Whitehead case,” be kept confidential. We conclude that these orders mandating confidentiality were invalid and that Respondent Justices lack constitutional or legislative authority to appoint a special master to investigate the leaks of information to the media and the reason for this court’s lost prestige. Accordingly, we grant Petitioner’s…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re HalversonNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. NEV. POLICY RESEARCH INST. v. MILLERNevada Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Falconi v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Landreth v. MalikNevada Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API