Legal Opinion

Fischer & Porter Co. v. Tolson

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 91-7822PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*94MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NAYTHONS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Presently before this Court is the Motion of Defendants to Compel Plaintiffs to Respond to Discovery Requests which were filed on June 17, 1992. In this action brought alleging violations of sections 10(b) and 20 of the Exchange Act, Rule 10b-5 and Pennsylvania common law1, Defendants seek to compel answers to a First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Produc*95tion of Documents submitted to Plaintiffs on February 24, 1992 and a Second Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production submitted on April 21, 1992.2 Plaintiffs filed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
  2. Nestle Foods Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  3. Cornaglia v. RicciardiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment DealerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. Strauss v. Credit Lyonnais, S.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  3. Weiss v. National Westminster Bank, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  4. B. Braun Medical Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. McCarthy v. Paine Webber Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API