Van Natta v. Great Lakes Reinsurance(UK) SE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT VAN NATTA, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 3:18-cv-438 (SRU) v. GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE (UK) SE, Defendant. ORDER In this case, Steven Van Natta and his mother Liette Van Natta (together, the “Plaintiffs”) sue Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) SE, now known as Great Lakes Insurance SE (“Great Lakes”), for breach of an insurance contract (the “Policy”). Great Lakes has refused to provide insurance coverage for severe water and mold damage to the Plaintiffs’ property, which Steven Van Natta used as a second home.1 Indeed, Great Lakes moved for summary…