American Automobile Ass'n v. AAA Insurance Agency, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
NOWLIN, District Judge.
This is an action for service mark infringement and unfair competition. Plaintiff contends that Defendant’s use of the designation “AAA” in its insurance business is likely to cause confusion and constitutes infringement of Plaintiff’s federally registered service marks under Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1), and that such use violates Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. §§ 17.41-63 (Vernon Supp. 1985), and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Union Carbide Corporation v. Ever-Ready Incorporated, a Corporation, and Mark Gilbert, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation v. Diversified Packaging CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fisons Horticulture, Inc., in No. 93-7224 v. Vigoro Industries, Inc., in No. 93-7287Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. v. CapeceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Emmpresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987
- Moore Push-Pin Co. v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.