Legal Opinion

State v. Feimster

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1974No. 7422SC394PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the court erred in consolidating his case with that of Wilford Walls who was also indicted for the homicide of Claude (Pete) Brown Sprinkle. Both defendants were indicted for an offense of the same class arising out of the same killing. Whether to consolidate the cases for trial rested within the court’s sound discretion. State v. Bass, 280 N.C. 435, 186 S.E. 2d 384; G.S. 15-152. The exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed absent a showing of abuse. State v. Yoes and Hale v. State, 271 N.C. 616, 157 S.E. 2d 386. No such showing has been made in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. Al-HamoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API