Legal Opinion

Bourgette v. Hubinger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1868PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from tho Bartholomew Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Three several suits were instituted, one in favor of Hubiuger, Dorsey & Co., against Bourgette aud Snyder, on an account and promissory noto. Tho complaint alleges that the defendants built and constructed a distillery on property known as “the distillery property” (which is then described by metes and bounds), in Bartholomew county, aud at their instance and request tho plaintiff's furnished and put up in said distillery tho machinery, works, and materials therefor, a bill of particulars of which is .filed with the complaint, amounting to §298.32, for a part of which, to wit, §284.85, tho…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howell v. ZerbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Abshire v. MatherIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Fleming v. PotterIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Vaughn v. StuzakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Holliday v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lantz v. MaffettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Gavin v. GraydonIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Eichbredt v. AngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Heavenridge v. MondyIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. O'Halloran v. LeacheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API