Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Stuzaker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Lagrange Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Suit on notes, and to foreclose a mortgage. The defendant answered that he purchased of plaintiff all *339of block three, containing ten lots, in, &c., for $680; that plaintiff executed a deed with full covenants, &c.; that the notes were given for a part, and the mortgage to secure all, of the purchase money, &c.; that the plaintiff was not then, nor has he since been, the owner of the two north lots of said ■ block, but that they were then a part of a public street, and the defendant has been by order of the Court compelled to permit them to be used for that purpose; that they were worth $65…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitbeck v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. Harvey v. DakinIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Scott v. StipeIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Westfall v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Toner v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Quick v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Shelbyville & Brandywine Turnpike Co. v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Cooper v. SeligCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Coleman v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API