Legal Opinion

Roehrdanz v. Schlink

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 4, 1985No. C2-84-2230PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Appellant George Roehrdanz appeals from a judgment denying his request for an attorney’s lien under Minn.Stat. § 481.-13. The determination was based on a referee’s report after an evidentiary hearing which was reviewed and approved by the trial court under Minn.R.Civ.P. 53.05(2). We affirm.

FACTS

In late 1979 Jerome Schlink retained George Roehrdanz to represent him in a marriage dissolution and other matters not relevant to this appeal. The lengthy and sharply contested dissolution proceeding involved the custody of one child and a relatively small amount of property.

Roeh…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kittler & Hedelson v. Sheehan Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Boline v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Village of New Brighton v. JamisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Hall-Vesole Co. v. Durkee-Atwood Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas A. Foster & Associates, Ltd. v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Reese Design, Inc. v. I-94 Highway 61 Eastview Center PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Gaughan v. GaughanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API