Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1925No. 16163. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

The city of Chicago instituted suit in the municipal court of that city to recover from the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, the Lake Sand Corporation and the Burlington South Chicago Terminal Railroad, a penalty for their failure to re-build about 1700 feet of dock on the south side of slip No. 1, adjoining the Calumet river on the west at 101st street, in the city of Chicago. Judgment was rendered for the defendants, and the city prosecutes this appeal on the ground that a freehold is involved.

The basis of appellant’s suit is the alleged violation of section 1727 of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. DrexelIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sanford v. KaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Gentleman v. SouleIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. People ex rel. Tilden v. MassieonIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Ligare v. Chicago, Madison & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holmstedt v. HolmstedtIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People Ex Rel. Schimpff v. NorvellIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Rossiter v. SoperIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Emalfarb v. KraterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Gricius v. LambertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API