Legal Opinion

State v. S.C. S.C.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1934No. 24398PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The demurrer admits all facts well pleaded and the petition alleges in terms that the position in question is "one in the unclassified service, as defined by Section 486-8 of the Ohio General Code." In view of the duties of the position as set forth in the petition, however, we think the allegation a legal conclusion not warranted by the facts pleaded, and, therefore, not admitted by the demurrer.

We also lay aside the allegation of service in the Canadian Army. Whether or not the legislature of Ohio may constitutionally prefer soldiers, sailors and others who served under the American colors,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Taylor and Marshall v. BeckhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Heim v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Shaw v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Graham v. SchmidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Almassy v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Stoor v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State ex rel. Brenders v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Clark v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1965

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API