People v. Bratton
Criminal Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter J. Benitez, J.
Defendant is charged in an accusatory instrument with criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree (Penal Law § 170.20). In substance, defendant is charged with possessing a forged Knicks basketball game ticket. Defendant has moved to dismiss the accusatory instrument for facial insufficiency, contending that the factual allegations concerning the basis for the officer’s statement that the ticket was forged are conclusory and hearsay. The People have responded arguing that the officer’s statements are based on firsthand knowledge and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. SwampNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re Jahron S.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. DeanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
- People v. GivensCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. DelacruzCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2009
- People v. HurdNassau County District Court · 2000