Legal Opinion

People v. Dean

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 23, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernard S. Greenbaum, J.

The defendant is charged with criminal possession of a *1032forged instrument in the third degree in violation of Penal Law § 170.20. The defendant, in an omnibus motion is seeking (1) to deem the information a misdemeanor complaint; (2) dismissal for facial insufficiency; (3) suppression of physical evidence; (4) Sandoval relief; (5) exculpatory material and (6) reservation of rights.

The court has reviewed the defendant’s moving papers, the People’s answer and the court file and after due deliberation finds as follows:

TO DEEM THE INFORMATION A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. People v. HaskinsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1981
  4. People v. SmithCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BrattonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
  2. People v. MalonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API