Legal Opinion

Northwestern Forwarding Co. v. Mahaffey, Slutz & Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Fh'ror from Anderson District Court. Action by The Northwestern Forwarding Company against Mahaffey, Slutz & Go. and Joseph Slutz, to recover $1,707.30. Trial by the court at the January Term, 1885, and judgment for defendants. The plaintiffs bring the case here. The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was au action commenced in the district court of Anderson county, on November 12, 1883, by George Y. Wallace and Charles W. Lyman, partners as the Northwestern Forwarding Company, against W. G. Mahaffey, J. C. Slutz and J. W. Slutz, partners as Mahaffey, Slutz & Co., to recover $1,707.30. On the same day an order of attachment was issued in the case, and levied upon the northeast quarter of section 22, township 21, range 19, in said county. On March 3, 1884, Joseph Slutz was made a party *153to the action, and he then filed his answer,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. OwnsbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
  2. Holden v. GarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  3. Reed v. OwnbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Carter v. ChampionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
  5. William Tyrell's Heirs, in Error v. Andrew Rountree and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1833

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Foster Lumber Co. v. Harlan County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Ingram v. IngramSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Bryant v. FordyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Exchange National Bank v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Marshall v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API