Legal Opinion

Ewald's v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 25, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeals from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

OpinioN of the Court by

Judge Carroll

— Affirming in each case.

A majority of the members, of the court finding themselves unable to agree as to the judgment that should be entered in these cases, the judgments appealed from must stand affirmed. But in view of the unusual and peculiar situation involved we have thought it proper to set out shortly the facts in the case and briefly the points of difference between the judges that prevent a majority of the court, or four of the judges, from agreeing on an opinion.

The Ewald Iron Company was incorporated under the laws of Kentucky on November 5,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ewald Iron Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1910
  2. Ewald Iron Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Ewald's v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. City of Louisville v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Ewald's v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API