Legal Opinion

Ewald Iron Co. v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 24, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Lyon Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Extended opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson.

*466_ In fixing two years as a reasonable time for a corporation to close up its business, the court followed the statute regulating the settlement of the estates of deceased persons. (Ky. St., sections 3858-59.) The corporation expired for business purposes on November 5, 1905. The property held in its name should be taxed in its name and as its property until November 5, 1907; after that time it should be taxed in the name of L. P. Ewald, and as his property. It is important in these tax matters that a definite rule be laid down that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ewald Iron Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Van WinkleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  2. Commonwealth v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Smith v. Commonwealth Land & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Ewald's v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Highbaugh v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API