Legal Opinion

Ewald's v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 17, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeals from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion

Response to Petition eor Rehearing by

Judge Carroll.

In response to the petition for rehearing filed by counsel for the Ewald estate, so much of the opinion in these cases that may be found in 168 Ky. 71, as recites that “The judgment in each case is affirmed by a divided court,” is withdrawn, because it does not correctly represent the views of the members of the court as set out in the opinion.

On a reconsideration of the cases the members of the court adhere to the conclusions ascribed to them in the opinion, and this being so it will be seen that Judges Settle, Hurt, Thomas and Carroll are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ewald's v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Ewald's v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API