Morales v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BASKIN, Judge.
Appellant Morales challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Morales contends, among other grounds, that trial counsel labored under a conflict of interest in his representation, depriving Morales of effective assistance of counsel. We agree. The record indicates that Morales’ counsel was subject to personal concerns regarding the effect of his trial conduct. Those concerns constituted the active representation of “ ‘conflicting interests’ ” which “ ‘adversely affected his ... performance,’ ” Strickland v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Gregory HurtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Bennie E. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jatar v. LamalettoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Brugmann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013