Legal Opinion

Jatar v. Lamaletto

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 3, 2000No. 3D99-2101PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEVIN, Judge.

Braulio Jatar appeals an adverse final summary judgment. We affirm.

Jatar brought an action for civil remedies pursuant to section 934.10, Florida Statutes (1989), alleging that defendants Camilo Lamaletto and Balgres Distributing Company, Inc. [collectively “defendants”], violated section 934.03, Florida Statutes (1989), making it unlawful to intercept and disclose oral communications without the prior consent of the parties. Lamaletto is a part-owner and employee of Balgres. Defendants recorded Jatar’s meeting with Lamaletto at Lamaletto’s office at Balgres’ facility.

Lamaletto…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. InciarranoSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. WallsSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Morales v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cohen Brothers, LLC. v. Me Corp., SaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical ProgressDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. Avrich v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. McDade v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Brugmann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API