Jatar v. Lamaletto
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SHEVIN, Judge.
Braulio Jatar appeals an adverse final summary judgment. We affirm.
Jatar brought an action for civil remedies pursuant to section 934.10, Florida Statutes (1989), alleging that defendants Camilo Lamaletto and Balgres Distributing Company, Inc. [collectively “defendants”], violated section 934.03, Florida Statutes (1989), making it unlawful to intercept and disclose oral communications without the prior consent of the parties. Lamaletto is a part-owner and employee of Balgres. Defendants recorded Jatar’s meeting with Lamaletto at Lamaletto’s office at Balgres’ facility.
Lamaletto…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. InciarranoSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- State v. WallsSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Morales v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cohen Brothers, LLC. v. Me Corp., SaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical ProgressDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Avrich v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- McDade v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Brugmann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.