Legal Opinion
Moore v. James
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 3, 1951No. 12309PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
This appeal concerns a construction of Rule 86, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, wherein it states that a plea of privilege does not constitute a denial under oath of any allegations of plaintiff’s petition required to be denied under oath by Rule 93, T.R.C.P., unless specifically alleged in the plea.
Appellants, C. H. Moore and wife, sued William N. James and C. A. Rundell, in Bexar County, and alleged that they were partners. Venue in the action against James was determined to be in Bexar County and he has not appealed, -but Run-dell’s plea of privilege, to be sued in Kerr…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Neal v. Texas Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- Jones v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Martin v. KieschnickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Home Ins. Co., New York v. BarbeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Watson v. Texas State Bank of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Petty v. First National Bank of QuitmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Hanover Insurance Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Keeling v. RigsbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Lone Star Brewing Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Ocean Systems, Inc. v. Educational & Research Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.