Legal Opinion

Martin v. Kieschnick

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1921No. 211-3308PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Third Supreme Judicial District. Suit by Richard Kieschnick and wife against Horace Martin and others. Decree dismissing the cause was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (208 S.’ W. 948), and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

Defendants in error filed this suit in the district court of Milam county, Tex., on September 22, 1916, seeking to restrain the enforcement of an execution issued out of the justice court, precinct No. 1 of Crockett county, Tex., upon a judgment gendered by that court against the Thorndale Mercantile Company. Plaintiff in error, the Thorndale Mercantile Company, a corporation, and Horace Martin, constable of precinct No. 8, Milam county, Tex., were named as defendants in the original petition. These defendants filed an answer on October 16,1916, consisting of a general demurrer and general…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SnyderTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hickman v. SwainTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Richardson v. WellsTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Graham v. McCarty & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Kieschnick v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Crosby v. Heldt Bros. TrucksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Hall v. CastleberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Harris v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Thorp Springs Christian College v. DabneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Lindley v. Merchants' & Farmers' State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API