Legal Opinion
Blish v. Time Saver Tools
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1956No. 5247PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
236 F.2d 913
111 U.S.P.Q. 6
BLISH, MIZE AND SILLIMAN HARDWARE COMPANY, a corporation of
Kansas, and Parker Manufacturing Company, a
corporation of Massachusetts, Appellants,
v.
TIME SAVER TOOLS, Inc., a corporation of Illinois; Bruce A.
Mackey; and Davrus Corporation, a corporation, Appellees.
No. 5247.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Aug. 29, 1956.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1956.
Cedric W. Porter, Boston, Mass. (L. G. Miller, Boston, Mass., on the brief), for appellants.
Owen J. Ooms, Chicago, Ill. (Norman B. Sorter, Kansas City, Kan., on the brief), for appellees.
Before HUXMAN, MURRAH and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Milgo Electronic Corporation, a Florida Corporation v. United Business Communications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Cmi Corporation v. Metropolitan Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976