Legal Opinion

Pistorius v. Travelers Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1985No. 332PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether a “dirt bike”, which cannot be licensed under the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code,1 is a motorcycle for purposes of applying the provision of the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act2 which disallows recovery of no-fault benefits by operators of motorcycles. The trial court held that a dirt bike was a motorcycle and that, although the bike operator had been killed in a collision with a licensed motor vehicle, the admin-istratrix of the deceased operator’s estate was ineligible to recover survivor’s benefits under the No-fault law. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Gallo v. J.C. Penney Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Winters v. Erie Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Pelter v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. PHILLIPS BY PHILLIPS v. Nationwide Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Adams v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API