Pistorius v. Travelers Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The issue in this appeal is whether a “dirt bike”, which cannot be licensed under the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code,1 is a motorcycle for purposes of applying the provision of the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act2 which disallows recovery of no-fault benefits by operators of motorcycles. The trial court held that a dirt bike was a motorcycle and that, although the bike operator had been killed in a collision with a licensed motor vehicle, the admin-istratrix of the deceased operator’s estate was ineligible to recover survivor’s benefits under the No-fault law. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Gallo v. J.C. Penney Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Winters v. Erie Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Pelter v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- PHILLIPS BY PHILLIPS v. Nationwide Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Adams v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.