Legal Opinion

Adams v. Harleysville Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1989No. 646PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

This appeal has been taken from the entry of summary judgment1 in favor of Harleysville Insurance Company (hereinafter appellee), in this action to recover *372first party benefits pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Act.2

Appellant, George Adams, was injured while riding as a passenger in a SEPTA trolley which struck the rear of a vehicle insured by appellee. Appellant filed a complaint seeking payment of first party benefits, pursuant to the policy issued by appellee to the driver of the automobile, and in conformity with the requirements of the Motor Vehicle…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rossi v. Pennsylvania State UniversitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Busy Beaver Building Centers, Inc. v. TuecheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Federal Kemper InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Ellis v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Pinell v. McCraryColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Walker v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API