N.E. Leasing, LLC v. Paoletta
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The primary issue in this protracted foreclosure litigation is the reasonableness of the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to a plaintiff in a foreclosure action. Where the note, mortgage and guarantee signed by the parties to be charged include indemnity provisions for reasonable attorney’s fees in the event the lender incurs such fees to protect its interest in the mortgaged property, including proceedings in bankruptcy, the court properly awarded reasonable fees *768where it found that the defense tactics were wholly without merit, delayed the court and denied equity…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Poole v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Smith v. SnyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Storm Associates, Inc. v. BaumgoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Jenzack Partners, LLC v. Stoneridge Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- N.E. Leasing, LLC v. PaolettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005