Legal Opinion

Ashland Transfer Co. v. State Tax Commission

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 16, 1932PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Couut by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

These two consolidated actions, separately filed in the Franklin circuit court by the respective appellants, as plaintiffs below, against the State Tax Commission, its members, and other related administrative hoards and their members, present the question of the constitutionality of chapter 106 of the Acts of 1932, which is on page 537 of the Session Acts for that year. Its title reads: “An act to further regulate motor-trucks, semi-trailer trucks, semi-trailers and trailers to enlarge the powers of the State Highway Commission, County Courts, and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Pressman v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bloemer v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. Johnson v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API