Legal Opinion
Frangos v. Doering Equipment Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 21, 1988No. Nos. 88-1330, 88-1331PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Parker-Hannifin Corporation (“Parker”) appeals from the judgment entered by the United States magistrate in favor of Appellees Doering Equipment, Inc. (“Doering”) and Logan Equipment Corporation (“Logan”) and from the magistrate’s dismissal of Appellant’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Parker also appeals from the order of the magistrate requesting Appel-lees to resubmit a detailed record of attorneys’ fees. The United States magistrate had jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Sirianni v. Nugent Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Tugboat Indian Co. v. A/S Ivarans RederiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Society for Testing & Materials v. Corrpro Companies, Inc., Michael Baach Warren Rogers Warren Rogers & Associates, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Szostek v. HartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- United States v. SchifferDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Amer Society Testing v. Corrpro Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Constantine A. Frangos v. Doering Equipment Corporation v. Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Pettibone Corporation, Pettibone Texas Corporation, Logan Equipment Corporation. Appeal of Parker-Hannifin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.