Legal Opinion

Constantine A. Frangos v. Doering Equipment Corporation v. Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Pettibone Corporation, Pettibone Texas Corporation, Logan Equipment Corporation. Appeal of Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 21, 1988No. 88-1330Published

1Opinion of the Court

860 F.2d 70

12 Fed.R.Serv.3d 579

Constantine A. FRANGOS

v.

DOERING EQUIPMENT CORPORATION

v.

PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION, Pettibone Corporation,

Pettibone Texas Corporation, Logan Equipment Corporation.

Appeal of PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION.

Nos. 88-1330, 88-1331.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6)

Sept. 30, 1988.

Decided Oct. 21, 1988.

Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Nov. 21, 1988.

John J. O'Brien, III, O'Brien & O'Brien Associates, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Benjamin Folkman, Weiner, Ostrager, Feldman & Zucker, Bala Cynwyd, Pa., for appellees.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Sirianni v. Nugent Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Tugboat Indian Co. v. A/S Ivarans RederiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API