Legal Opinion

Schmit v. Klumpyan

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 16, 2003No. 02-2387PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

¶ 1. This appeal requires us to consider whether sufficient evidence was presented to establish that the initiation and continuation of a partition action constituted an abuse of process. To prevail on an abuse of process claim, a party must present evidence that another party used the process in a manner not intended and to gain a collateral advantage. We reverse; the evidence presented in this case does not establish that the partition action was used for any purpose other than its intended purpose, the resolution of a dispute over real estate owned by multiple parties.

Procedural Background

¶…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Noll v. Dimiceli's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  4. Strid v. ConverseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Anderson Development Co. v. TobiasUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Rusakiewicz v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Wisconsin Public Service Corp. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  4. Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Prince Corp. v. VandenbergCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API