Legal Opinion
Payne v. Candelora
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 4, 1997No. File CV910325370PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLager, J.
The present case is a civil action for personal injuries based on alleged exposure to lead-based paint. The plaintiffs are Jantel Payne and her minor children, Keisha Barnes and Isaiah Barnes. The plaintiffs have alleged that they resided in the first floor apartment of 36 Mechanic Street in New Haven, from March 1, 1989, to on or about September 1, 1991. The defendant Vincent Liberti owned the property from January 1, 1988, through February 15, 1991. First Constitution Bank (First Constitution) was the mortgagee of the property. Liberti transferred control to First Constitution on October 1,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Doty v. MucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Gore v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gore v. People's Savings BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lian v. StalickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Lian v. StalickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Simms v. CandelaConnecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Bland v. Moriarty, No. Lpl-Cv-95-0379438s (Nov. 3, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- State v. Boisvert, No. Cr 99-0196364s (May 5, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.