Legal Opinion

Simms v. Candela

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 4, 1998No. File CV98040784SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlue, J.

This case raises an important question concerning the application of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., to claims involving personal injuries. The plaintiff, Michael S. Simms, alleges that he was injured by falling on a defective outside stairway leading to his apartment building and that the defect (a build up of ice) resulted from a building condition that violated Connecticut’s Landlord and Tenant Act, General Statutes § 47a-l et seq. Citing this alleged violation, he has added a CUTPA claim to his complaint. Although slip and fall…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. Wiggins v. Peachtree Settlement Funding (In Re Wiggins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
  3. Pinette v. McLaughlinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. Ward v. Defilippo, No. Cv-01-0066724-S (Mar. 25, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API