Eubanks v. First Protection Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
In its answer defendant captioned its allegations of false representations a “counterclaim.” The Company now contends that plaintiff’s failure to file a reply to that “counterclaim” operated as an admission of those allegations, entitling it to summary judgment or a directed verdict. The propriety of the trial court’s denial of the motion for summary judgment is not proper ly before the court on this appeal. A motion for summary judgment is a pretrial motion which does not determine the merits. The effect of denial is merely to allow the case to go to trial. Oil Co. v. Smith, 34…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Jones v. Home Security Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Rhinehardt v. North Carolina Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Lineberry v. Security Life & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pittman v. First Protection Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Sprinkle v. N.C. Wildlife Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Connor v. Royal Globe Insur. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Cornelius v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Brown v. LanierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.