Legal Opinion

Eubanks v. First Protection Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1979No. 794SC79PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

In its answer defendant captioned its allegations of false representations a “counterclaim.” The Company now contends that plaintiff’s failure to file a reply to that “counterclaim” operated as an admission of those allegations, entitling it to summary judgment or a directed verdict. The propriety of the trial court’s denial of the motion for summary judgment is not proper ly before the court on this appeal. A motion for summary judgment is a pretrial motion which does not determine the merits. The effect of denial is merely to allow the case to go to trial. Oil Co. v. Smith, 34…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Jones v. Home Security Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Rhinehardt v. North Carolina Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Lineberry v. Security Life & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pittman v. First Protection Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Sprinkle v. N.C. Wildlife Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Connor v. Royal Globe Insur. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Cornelius v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Brown v. LanierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API