Legal Opinion
National Bank of Kentucky v. Louisville Trust Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 13, 1933No. 6435PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHickenlooper, Circuit Judge
(after stating the foregoing facts).
This is an action brought by the appellee for speeifie performance of an alleged parol contract for the sale to appellant of certain real estate in the city of Louisville, known as 421 West Market street, which contract was said to have been entered into on June 21, 1929. The defendant bank having subsequently become insolvent, and its affairs being in the process of final liquidation, it is conceded that an action in equity for specific performance, strictly speaking, will not lie against either the receiver or the bank. The contract, if one there was,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Head & Amory v. Providence Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1804
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re BoothUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1982
- In Re William Terrell and Tammy Terrell, Debtors. William Terrell and Tammy Terrell v. Eugene Albaugh, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Atherton v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Guarantee Electric Co. v. Big Rivers Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987
- Laurent v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.