Legal Opinion

Flynn v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1949No. 11720PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

Arthur Lee Flynn was indicted by a United States Grand Jury in four counts for falsely representing himself to be a United States officer, 18 U.S.C.A. § 76.1 Upon trial he was acquitted upon all counts and subsequently he was indicted in seven counts for perjury, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312 allegedly committed in the course of the trial to which reference has just been made. He was tried upon the perjury accusations by a court and jury, and the jury returned a single verdict which specifically stated that the jury found him guilty of each separate count of the indictment.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Samuel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  3. Hogue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. United States v. SimplotDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1961
  3. United States v. Beddy G. CuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. BertmanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API