Legal Opinion
United States v. Simplot
District Court, D. Utah
Decided April 3, 1961No. Cr-40-61PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSON, District Judge.
The defendant has moved to dismiss the following indictment for perjury on the ground that it is fatally defective for uncertainty:
“The Grand Jury charges:
“That on or about February 8, 1960, J. R. Simplot, having taken an oath before the United States District Court for the District of Utah in a ease being heard in that court, to wit, Archer vs. J. R. Simplot Company, Civil No. C-31-58, in which case the law of the United States authorized an oath to be administered, that he would testify truly, willfully and contrary to such oath stated and testified to a material…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. RemingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Woolley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hsu v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States v. Louis Rex CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. FarinasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Lemberes v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.