Legal Opinion

United States v. Bertman

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided December 22, 1983No. Crim. 82-01218PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER

PENCE, District Judge.

The defendant in this case, Phillip Bert-man, has asked this court to reconsider its earlier decision refusing to dismiss his perjury indictment and to enter a new order dismissing the indictment. For the reasons laid out here, this court declines to reconsider its earlier decision.

The gravamen of Bertman’s complaint is that the indictment that charged him with making false statements before the grand jury did not contain a paragraph setting out what the objective truth was. Bert-man’s earlier arguments on this point were considered and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Victor Cowley and Michael St. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Flynn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Rick SerolaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. ButtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API