Legal Opinion

Estate of Lane v. Lane

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1981No. 5366PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case was brought as an action for the enforcement of a California judgment against Henry Lane, now deceased,. According to the amended complaint, the judgment sought to be enforced is a divorcee decree which became final in 1966 and under which Lane was obligated to pay $100 per month as child support for each of his three children by his former wife, Erika Lane, and $100 per month as alimony to her.

Erika Lane first requested that partial summary judgment be entered in her favor as to the amount of arrearages. In support of the motion she referred to a 1976 abstract of judgment…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Briggs v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Wetzler v. WetzlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Salmeri v. SalmeriWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Young v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Willhite v. WillhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sedwick v. GwinnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. Consumers United Insurance v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Hunter v. Hansen (In Re Hansen)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API