Estate of Lane v. Lane
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case was brought as an action for the enforcement of a California judgment against Henry Lane, now deceased,. According to the amended complaint, the judgment sought to be enforced is a divorcee decree which became final in 1966 and under which Lane was obligated to pay $100 per month as child support for each of his three children by his former wife, Erika Lane, and $100 per month as alimony to her.
Erika Lane first requested that partial summary judgment be entered in her favor as to the amount of arrearages. In support of the motion she referred to a 1976 abstract of judgment…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Briggs v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Wetzler v. WetzlerAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Salmeri v. SalmeriWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Young v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Willhite v. WillhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Sedwick v. GwinnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Consumers United Insurance v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hunter v. Hansen (In Re Hansen)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990