Legal Opinion

Sedwick v. Gwinn

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 18, 1994No. 31487-4-IPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pekelis, A.C.J.

— Stephen, Stanley, and Ruth Gwinn (the Gwinns) appeal the trial court’s order granting Katharine Sedwick’s (Sedwick) motion for partial summary judgment. The Gwinns contend that genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether the challenged loan transactions involved either the actual intent to defraud or constructive fraud under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. We agree and reverse.

I

In September 1991, trial commenced between Katharine Sedwick and Stephen Gwinn on Sedwick’s petition for a postdissolution modification to their parenting plan. At this time, Stephen…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  2. Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Gossett v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Freitag v. McGhieWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Freitag v. McGhieWashington Supreme Court · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API