Legal Opinion
Robert Hayward v. Walter T. Stone, Superintendent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1975No. 74--3444PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BROWNING and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:
On an earlier appeal in this habeas corpus proceeding, we remanded for further proceedings in the district court and expressed no opinion on the merit of Hayward’s claim. Hayward v. Stone, 496 F.2d 844 (9th Cir. 1974).
Upon remand, the district court issued an order to show cause, the respondents filed a return and lodged copies of the reporter’s and clerk’s transcripts on appeal of Hayward’s 1968 state court trial. Petitioner filed a traverse in opposition to the respondent’s return.
Hayward was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Charles Earl Brubaker v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Lawrence George Kruchten v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Bennie Ray Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Leo F. Kreiling v. H. v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Troy Cooper v. C. J. FitzharrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978