Legal Opinion

Leo F. Kreiling v. H. v. Field

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 1970No. 23593PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner was convicted in a Superior Court of California by a jury verdict of maliciously obstructing a telephone apparatus, in violation of Cal. Penal Code § 591. 1 The judgment was affirmed on appeal. Post-conviction relief was sought in the state court and denied. A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied by order of the United States District Court. This appeal is from that order.

Three grounds for relief are asserted.

Petitioner claims that his five year sentence (to be served concurrently with other sentences) for tampering with a public telephone and making it inoperative is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles Earl Brubaker v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. John Allen Kendrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Record Revolution No. 6 v. City of Parma, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
  2. Tobacco Road v. City of NoviDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
  3. Houston v. NelsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1975
  4. Hernandez v. CravenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1972
  5. State v. JesseeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API