Legal Opinion
Pitts v. Aerolite SPE Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 2, 1987No. Civ. A. 83-2890-Y, 84-1595-Y and 85-0132-YPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
These cases are before the Court on the motions for summary judgment filed by all the defendants 1 who argue that the plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the relevant statutes of limitations. In each case the plaintiffs have brought a products liability action for negligence and breach of warranty seeking recovery for personal injuries, loss of consortium, and, in one case, property damage. In Case No. 83-2890-Y (hereinafter the “Pitts Case”), Albert R. Pitts, his wife Dorothy, and their son Michael 2 allege that they have been injured due to their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- One Wheeler Road Associates v. Foxboro Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Kozikowski v. Toll Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- George Cornell v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.